Vue 在更新 DOM 时是异步执行的
。只要侦听到数据变化,Vue 将开启一个队列,并缓冲在同一事件循环中发生的所有数据变更。如果同一个 watcher 被多次触发,只会被推入到队列中一次。这种在缓冲时去除重复数据对于避免不必要的计算和 DOM 操作是非常重要的。然后,在下一个的事件循环“tick”中,Vue 刷新队列并执行实际 (已去重的) 工作。Vue 在内部对异步队列尝试使用原生的 Promise.then
、MutationObserver
和 setImmediate
,如果执行环境不支持,则会采用 setTimeout(fn, 0)
代替。
当你设置 vm.someData = 'new value'
,该组件不会立即重新渲染。当刷新队列时,组件会在下一个事件循环“tick”中更新。多数情况我们不需要关心这个过程,但是如果你想基于更新后的 DOM 状态来做点什么,这就可能会有些棘手。虽然 Vue.js 通常鼓励开发人员使用“数据驱动”的方式思考,避免直接接触 DOM,但是有时我们必须要这么做。为了在数据变化之后等待 Vue 完成更新 DOM,可以在数据变化之后立即使用 Vue.nextTick(callback)。这样回调函数将在 DOM 更新完成后被调用。例如:
<div id="example">{{message}}</div>
var vm = new Vue({
el: '#example',
data: {
message: '123'
}
})
vm.message = 'new message' // 更改数据
vm.$el.textContent === 'new message' // false
Vue.nextTick(function () {
vm.$el.textContent === 'new message' // true
})
在组件内则使用 vm.$nextTick()
实例方法,回调函数中的 this 将自动绑定到当前的 Vue 实例上:
Vue.component('example', {
template: '<span>{{ message }}</span>',
data: function () {
return {
message: '未更新'
}
},
methods: {
updateMessage: function () {
this.message = '已更新'
console.log(this.$el.textContent) // => '未更新'
this.$nextTick(function () {
console.log(this.$el.textContent) // => '已更新'
})
}
}
})
Vue 2.1.0 起新增:如果没有提供回调且在支持 Promise 的环境中,则返回一个 Promise。请注意 Vue 不自带 Promise 的 polyfill,所以如果你的目标浏览器不原生支持 Promise,你得自己提供 polyfill。
所以如果你不想通过回调的方式使用Vue.nextTick()
,你可以使用新的 ES2016 async/await 语法完成相同的事情:
methods: {
updateMessage: async function () {
this.message = '已更新'
console.log(this.$el.textContent) // => '未更新'
await this.$nextTick()
console.log(this.$el.textContent) // => '已更新'
}
}
nextTick源码解析
Vue.nextTick()方法的源码存在于Vue版本库的 /src/core/util/next-tick.js
文件里,为方便理解阅读,我们使用编译后的源代码:
var isUsingMicroTask = false;
var callbacks = [];
var pending = false;
function flushCallbacks () {
pending = false;
var copies = callbacks.slice(0);
callbacks.length = 0;
for (var i = 0; i < copies.length; i++) {
copies[i]();
}
}
// Here we have async deferring wrappers using microtasks.
// In 2.5 we used (macro) tasks (in combination with microtasks).
// However, it has subtle problems when state is changed right before repaint
// (e.g. #6813, out-in transitions).
// Also, using (macro) tasks in event handler would cause some weird behaviors
// that cannot be circumvented (e.g. #7109, #7153, #7546, #7834, #8109).
// So we now use microtasks everywhere, again.
// A major drawback of this tradeoff is that there are some scenarios
// where microtasks have too high a priority and fire in between supposedly
// sequential events (e.g. #4521, #6690, which have workarounds)
// or even between bubbling of the same event (#6566).
var timerFunc;
// The nextTick behavior leverages the microtask queue, which can be accessed
// via either native Promise.then or MutationObserver.
// MutationObserver has wider support, however it is seriously bugged in
// UIWebView in iOS >= 9.3.3 when triggered in touch event handlers. It
// completely stops working after triggering a few times... so, if native
// Promise is available, we will use it:
/* istanbul ignore next, $flow-disable-line */
if (typeof Promise !== 'undefined' && isNative(Promise)) {
var p = Promise.resolve();
timerFunc = function () {
p.then(flushCallbacks);
// In problematic UIWebViews, Promise.then doesn't completely break, but
// it can get stuck in a weird state where callbacks are pushed into the
// microtask queue but the queue isn't being flushed, until the browser
// needs to do some other work, e.g. handle a timer. Therefore we can
// "force" the microtask queue to be flushed by adding an empty timer.
if (isIOS) { setTimeout(noop); }
};
isUsingMicroTask = true;
} else if (!isIE && typeof MutationObserver !== 'undefined' && (
isNative(MutationObserver) ||
// PhantomJS and iOS 7.x
MutationObserver.toString() === '[object MutationObserverConstructor]'
)) {
// Use MutationObserver where native Promise is not available,
// e.g. PhantomJS, iOS7, Android 4.4
// (#6466 MutationObserver is unreliable in IE11)
var counter = 1;
var observer = new MutationObserver(flushCallbacks);
var textNode = document.createTextNode(String(counter));
observer.observe(textNode, {
characterData: true
});
timerFunc = function () {
counter = (counter + 1) % 2;
textNode.data = String(counter);
};
isUsingMicroTask = true;
} else if (typeof setImmediate !== 'undefined' && isNative(setImmediate)) {
// Fallback to setImmediate.
// Techinically it leverages the (macro) task queue,
// but it is still a better choice than setTimeout.
timerFunc = function () {
setImmediate(flushCallbacks);
};
} else {
// Fallback to setTimeout.
timerFunc = function () {
setTimeout(flushCallbacks, 0);
};
}
function nextTick (cb, ctx) {
var _resolve;
callbacks.push(function () {
if (cb) {
try {
cb.call(ctx);
} catch (e) {
handleError(e, ctx, 'nextTick');
}
} else if (_resolve) {
_resolve(ctx);
}
});
if (!pending) {
pending = true;
timerFunc();
}
// $flow-disable-line
if (!cb && typeof Promise !== 'undefined') {
return new Promise(function (resolve) {
_resolve = resolve;
})
}
}
callbacks
用来存储所有需要执行的回调函数
callbacks.push(function () {
if (cb) {
try {
cb.call(ctx);
} catch (e) {
handleError(e, ctx, 'nextTick');
}
} else if (_resolve) {
_resolve(ctx);
}
});
pending
用来标志是否正在执行回调函数,如果当前回调队列正在执行,则不再去执行。
if (!pending) {
pending = true
timerFunc()
}
flushCallbacks
刷新回调队列,执行回调并将回调队列里的回调清空,改函数将作为Promise.then(fn)、MutationObserver(fn)、 setImmediate(fn)以及setTimeout(fn, 0)的回调执行。
function flushCallbacks () {
pending = false
const copies = callbacks.slice(0)
callbacks.length = 0
for (let i = 0; i < copies.length; i++) {
copies[i]()
}
}
timerFunc
用来触发执行回调函数,timerFunc是上回调函数flushCallbacks
的执行体,该函数起到延迟执行的作用
注:
Promise.then(fn)
和MutationObserver(fn)
为Microtask。setImmediate(fn)
和setTimeout(fn, 0)
为Macrotask。
这篇文章目前没有评论